Forgiveness Tested

Forgiveness is hard work. Stories of forgiveness inspire me to keep working on “forgive one another.” Here’s one from a good friend, whose name I’ve changed to protect the other party.

Jane attended a small private college about 40 years ago. In her senior year, she became engaged to a young man who had graduated from that college and was an adjunct professor there. Shortly thereafter, Jane’s fiancé became concerned about some college policies and expressed his views to the administration; he was fired. Jane’s mother wrote a letter to the college president in defense of her future son-in-law; the president responded with harsh comments about her character, and declared that Jane was ineligible to graduate from the college. So, with just a few credits to go, Jane had to leave that college without a degree.

A committed follower of Jesus Christ, Jane knew she had to forgive the college president, and over the years, God gave her the grace to do that. Jane says it was in some ways harder to forgive the president for the hurtful comments made to her mother than for what he did to Jane herself. Jane married her fiancé, they moved out of state, and they have enjoyed a happy marriage and fruitful ministry.

But Jane’s forgiveness was tested last month: Jane happened to be flying out of the airport of the city where the college is located, and when she got to her gate, she spotted the college president and his wife waiting to board her plane. After a quick prayer, Jane approached the now-former president, identifying herself as a student who had enjoyed her years at the college. The ex-president and his wife were delighted to talk with her. Their flight got delayed, so the ex-president invited Jane to join them in the airline club, where they continued their pleasant conversation. They parted with hugs all around. Jane never mentioned the non-graduation/libel incident to him, and he evidently never made the connection, that this lady whose company he was enjoying was the one he had deprived of a diploma forty years before.

We can say that we have forgiven someone who hurt us in the past. We can truly believe that we have forgiven that person, especially if we never see them again. But if we do see them again, our decision is tested: did I truly forgive him? And perhaps the real test is when the new encounter is unexpected—Jane didn’t have time to work through the forgiveness process as she sat at the gate trying to decide whether to engage with the college president. She had already done the hard work—her heart was clear.

It would’ve been easy for Jane to have ignored the president—we can think of a million justifications. She says she knew the Holy Spirit was prompting her to engage with him and his wife, so she obeyed, however reluctantly—and she was blessed for her obedience.

There are times when it is right to gently confront the other person with their sin, and part of me wishes that Jane had confronted the ex-president with his foolish, vindictive decision to deny her the diploma she had earned. But the man is elderly now, his presidency long behind him. Correction now won’t help him be a better college president. And bringing up the painful incident could have spoiled the pleasant encounter.

Jane’s behavior humbles me in two ways: First, I’m awed by her ability to forgive this injustice. It was a mean abuse of power, and could have had life-long repercussions for her. Could I have forgiven this? Second, I’m impressed that she walked over to the ex-president in the airport terminal, and engaged him. I can well imagine myself deciding to forego the opportunity—he would never know, and if I’ve already forgiven him, why test it?

Peacemaker Ministries offers four promises that “test” whether we’ve really forgiven someone:

I will not dwell on this incident.
I will not bring up this incident again and use it against you.
I will not allow this incident to stand in the way of my relationship with you.
I will not speak to others about this incident.

My friend Jane passed the test! Could I? Could you?

A Church Conflict Close to Home

Another church in Lansing, Michigan, has a conflict big enough to make newspaper headlines. The church – ironically named Friendship Baptist – is in the news again this week after one faction of the church allegedly locked the other faction out of the building they both still share. According to the Lansing State Journal, “The church has been split for years over disputes related to a 2007 update to the church’s constitution and where church funds should be deposited.” Each of the factions is led by a pastor, and the two groups were apparently sharing the building, holding services at different times, until one group accused the other of damaging the building, leading to the lockout.

Conflicts like these are what drove me into Christian conciliation. Christians are called to share the gospel of Jesus Christ, but we undermine our evangelism efforts when we have public disputes like this. What non-Christians would be attracted to this?

Another irony here is that the article says a leader in the mayor’s office has been mediating between the two groups for years. The Apostle Paul, in his first letter to the Corinthians, exhorted Christians to resolve their disputes within the church – i.e.., privately — , rather than in a public forum. We shouldn’t need the help of the mayor’s office—we ought to be ahead of the curve, setting an example to the rest of the world for how to live in peace.

I will be praying that my brothers and sisters at Friendship Baptist church re-discover the true head of their church, Jesus Christ, and call on His power to restore their friendship.

Note: More details on this conflict can be found in a Lansing State Journal article published June 21, 2014. As of September, the conflict is continuing.

 

Four Words That Are Better Than Three

“I love you.” The three little words that everyone wants to hear, that we don’t say often enough, that comprise one of the most powerful things we can say to someone.

But it occurs to me there’s an even more powerful, meaningful sentence: “I still love you.” These four words connote a lot that may be missing from a simple “I love you.” The three-word sentence could be spoken out of infatuation, excitement, even hopefulness.

But the four-word version says a lot more: it implies full knowledge, forgiveness, commitment.

It’s the message of God to us, over and over in the Bible. And it’s one of the most moving things we can hear from—or say to–another person.

Today is my 19th wedding anniversary. I still love him—and, to my astonishment and delight, he still loves me.

Two More Public Apologies

A couple more public apologies in the media recently:

Donald Sterling, owner of the NBA basketball team the Los Angeles Clippers, made racist comments to a girlfriend last month that became public. His attempt in a CNN interview last week to apologize ended up making things worse—as bad apologies will do.

It started out well: “I made a terrible mistake. I’m here to apologize. I’m asking for forgiveness. I’ll never do it again.” These are essential components of an effective apology. But he made a mistake common to many of us when we attempt to apologize: he kept talking. The best thing to do after a good apology is to stop talking and wait. In fact, Peacemaker Ministries recommends that the apology end with a question rather than a statement; the question is, “Will you forgive me?”

Yesterday, South Korean President Park Geun-hye apologized for her government’s role in the ferry disaster last month that killed over 300 people. “As the President who should be responsible for people’s life and security, I am sincerely apologizing to the people for having to suffer pain,” she said. “The final responsibility for not being able to respond properly lies on me.” Taking responsibility is an important component of a good apology. Another is to do something to ensure the offense won’t happen again—as Peacemaker Ministries calls it, “Alter behavior.” President Park’s speech included her decision to dismantle the Coast Guard, recognizing that its current structure impeded the search and rescue process. So her apology isn’t bad – although probably not enough for the grieving families.

The benefit of critiquing public apologies is to reflect on what makes an effective apology – and what doesn’t — so that our own apologies will be effective. There’s just no substitute for a good apology.

Detroit Bankruptcy Using Mediation

The bankruptcy proceedings for the City of Detroit are making good use of mediation. Judge Steven Rhodes, who is overseeing the bankruptcy, appointed U.S. District Judge Gerald Rosen as lead mediator last August, and Judge Rosen assembled a team of mediators, comprised of four federal judges as well as Attorney Gene Driker, an esteemed Michigan mediator who received the State Bar of Michigan ADR Section’s Distinguished Service Award in 2012.

The mediation team has experienced both successes and setbacks. Today was another success story: the mediation team announced that Detroit reached a tentative agreement with 14 of its unions. The team also brokered a deal recently with the Retired Police and Firefighters Association involving pensions and health care benefits. A setback occurred in January when Judge Rhodes rejected the deal hammered out with two banks that are major creditors of the city, UBS and Bank of America. Last week, Judge Rhodes ordered officials from Detroit and Oakland, Macomb and Wayne Counties last week to go into closed mediation to continue talks toward creating a regional water authority.

Mediation is not often used in municipal bankruptcies but perhaps Detroit’s experience will open doors for new opportunities in the future.